ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Treating hematologic immune dysregulation in inborn errors of immunity: a real-life multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hematologic immune dysregulation (H-ID) - including autoimmune cytopenia (AIC), lymphoproliferation (LPD), and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) - is a potentially life-threatening manifestation of inborn errors of immunity (IEI). Despite the availability of targeted therapies, its management remains challenging, with no standardized treatment strategies established. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the available treatments for H-ID, with a specific focus on the treatment indications and outcome differences between targeted versus non-targeted therapies. Methods: This multicentric retrospective study included 116 patients with IEI and H-ID across Italian tertiary care centers. Data included treatment indications, response rate, and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results: We included patients with autoimmune lymphoproliferative immunodeficiencies (ALPID, 37.1%), humoral immunodeficiencies (31%), syndromic IEI (8.6%), and combined immunodeficiencies (8.6%). H-ID consisted of AIC (67.2%), LPD (71.6%), and HLH (9.5%). 85.3% of patients received treatment, including on-demand therapies (37.9%), long-term treatments (LTT, 84.8%), and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT; 9.1%). LTT included sirolimus (42.9%), mycophenolate mofetil (34.5%), rituximab (29.8%), and targeted therapies (17.9%). Sirolimus showed a higher complete response (CR) rate (61.1%), especially in ALPID patients and those with lymphoproliferation (72%). CR rate was significantly higher in patients receiving targeted therapies (80% vs 43.4%, Conclusions: The indications for LTT and HSCT in H-ID are still heterogeneous. Response rates are variable and influenced by the underlying diagnosis. Targeted therapies are associated with an improved response, the suboptimal molecular diagnosis rate currently limits their use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.