ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Ocular adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To systematically characterize ocular adverse events (oAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and to quantify their disproportionality reporting signals using real-world pharmacovigilance data. Methods: This retrospective pharmacovigilance study analyzed oAE reports associated with four ICI treatment regimens-anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy, anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy, and the novel nivolumab plus relatlimab combination-using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the first quarter of 2011 through the second quarter of 2025. Disproportionality analyses were conducted to detect potential safety signals employing three complementary metrics: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and information component (IC). Additional analyses included ophthalmologist-reviewed clinical grouping of uveitis subtypes, stratification by underlying tumor indication, and temporal trend assessment. Results: A total of 5,244 oAE reports associated with ICIs were identified. At the preferred term (PT) level, the strongest overall signals were predominantly inflammatory ocular conditions, including uveitis (ROR 6.04, 95% CI 5.45-6.69), scleritis (ROR 4.85, 95% CI 3.20-7.36), and optic neuritis (ROR 4.59, 95% CI 3.91-5.39). Combination therapy was associated with markedly stronger disproportionality signals; notably, the ROR for uveitis with nivolumab plus ipilimumab reached 15.44 (95% CI 13.24 to 18.00), compared with 4.37 for anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy. The nivolumab plus relatlimab regimen showed preliminary signals for keratitis (ROR 13.82, 95% CI 3.44 to 55.61) and diplopia (ROR 9.59, 95% CI 3.07 to 29.91), though based on a very small sample (N = 18). Melanoma was disproportionately represented among uveitis-spectrum cases (53.6%), and temporal analysis revealed a declining uveitis proportion paralleling the expansion of ICI use beyond melanoma. Conclusion: ICIs are strongly associated with disproportionality signals for inflammatory ocular adverse events, with substantially higher signals observed for combination therapies compared with monotherapy. These hypothesis-generating findings highlight the need for prompt ophthalmologic assessment and individualized, multidisciplinary surveillance in patients receiving ICI treatment, particularly combined regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.