Evidence mapPaperPMID 42577266Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Innovative digital twin framework for early risk detection and personalized perinatal healthcare.

Mario Sanz Rodrigo, Virginia Anton Yuste, Diego Rivera, Jose Ignacio Moreno, Xavier Larriva Novo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mario Sanz RodrigoEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación (ETSIT), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Virginia Anton YusteEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación (ETSIT), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Diego RiveraEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación (ETSIT), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Jose Ignacio MorenoEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación (ETSIT), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
Xavier Larriva NovoEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación (ETSIT), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnancy-related complications such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and preeclampsia require timely identification, as initially low-risk pregnancies may develop clinically relevant risks during follow-up. Digital Health and Telemedicine can support remote monitoring, while Digital Twin (DT) technology offers a framework for integrating longitudinal patient data with predictive models. However, DT-based perinatal systems remain exploratory and require methodological validation before clinical use. Methods: This study presents a proof-of-concept DT framework for perinatal monitoring. Three data roles are distinguished: public benchmark datasets for model training and testing, synthetic patient records generated with Synthea to simulate prenatal consultations, and synthetic time-stamped wearable-like records generated with Gretel.ai to emulate repeated monitoring at the data-acquisition layer. Clinical and wearable-like streams were processed independently and combined only at the interpretation stage. Results: The maternal risk model performed better for low- and high-risk classes than for the intermediate class, supporting its use as a screening-oriented component rather than a definitive classifier. GDM models achieved high recall for the GDM class in both clinical and wearable-like configurations. By contrast, preeclampsia prediction showed limited performance, especially with wearable-accessible blood pressure variables alone; the clinical model improved the class profile but remained insufficient for clinical deployment. The simulated patient cases illustrate the DT workflow and the limitations of wearable-only inputs for complex obstetric risk stratification. Discussion: The proposed framework should be interpreted as a methodological prototype for organizing clinical and time-stamped wearable-like data within a perinatal DT. The results support combining episodic clinical information with repeated physiological monitoring, but also show that model calibration, class imbalance, richer clinical features, and validation with real longitudinal cohorts are needed before clinical decision-support use. Future work will focus on real-world validation, sequence-aware modelling, and integration with clinical workflows under medical supervision.

Indexed as

digital twingestational diabetesmachine learningmaternal healthpreeclampsiapregnancysynthetic datawearables

Identifiers

PMID42577266
PMCPMC13454054

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.