ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Beyond exhaustion: T cell fitness for next generation of immunotherapy for hematological cancer.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T cell-directed immunotherapies have transformed the treatment of hematological malignancies, but durable benefit remains limited by relapse, poor persistence, incomplete immune reconstitution and infection. These outcomes depend not only on target-antigen expression but also on the functional quality of the T cell compartment. In this Review, we define T cell fitness as a multidimensional capacity that includes cellular availability, memory reserve, proliferative competence, cytotoxic function, metabolic resilience, resistance to chronic stimulation and persistence. We distinguish exhaustion, senescence and terminal differentiation as overlapping but non-equivalent states and propose a measurable, modality-specific assessment framework rather than reliance on a single marker. We then compare how these states arise in multiple myeloma, lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia, emphasizing the effects of age, tissue niche, disease burden and prior therapy. We critically appraise evidence from CAR-T cell therapy, bispecific antibodies and checkpoint blockade, including the limitations of predominantly retrospective, correlative and disease-specific datasets. Finally, we translate the fitness framework into clinical questions: when to collect cells, how to select bridging therapy, which biomarkers merit prospective testing, how treatment duration and sequencing may preserve immune competence, and where gene-edited products, CAR-NK cells and metabolic interventions may reduce dependence on compromised autologous T cells. A fitness-based approach may support more precise biomarker development and safer treatment selection, but prospective validation and modality-specific thresholds are still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.