ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Evolution and trends in tremor diagnosis and differential diagnosis-a bibliometric study.
Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tremor is one of the most common motor symptom across movement disorders, and its precise diagnosis has become increasingly critical. However, existing studies remain fragmented. They often focus on specific disease manifestations or isolated diagnostic techniques, but lack systematic analysis. A comprehensive review is therefore needed to consolidate insights and guide future diagnostic advancements. Methods: We systematically searched the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and ClinicalTrials.gov (January 2016-August 2025), identifying 1,145 publications and 47 trials. Bibliometric networks were then visualized and analyzed using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and the R package "bibliometrix." Results: Annual publication volume increased steadily, while citations rose from 2016 and peaked in 2021. The United States led in publications, whereas Germany held the highest betweenness centrality. Yale University ranked first in publication output, and University College London had the greatest betweenness centrality. Louis, Elan D was the most influential author, leading in publication count, citation frequency, and betweenness centrality. Conclusion: This study comprehensively maps the research landscape in tremor diagnosis and differential diagnosis over the past decade. On this basis, it identifies current limitations, and predicts emerging research frontiers, thereby offering valuable insights and guidance for future scientific investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.