ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming at the interface of chemoresistance and immune-cold tumor states.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemoresistance and the immune-cold tumor microenvironment are major barriers to durable cancer control, yet they frequently emerge from overlapping mitochondrial adaptations selected by cytotoxic stress. In resistant tumors, mitochondria regulate oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), redox buffering, apoptosis thresholds, organelle quality control, and metabolite overflow, while also shaping how antitumor immune cells experience nutrient deprivation, hypoxia, acidosis, and chronic danger signaling. Rather than assuming a single causal chain, this review distinguishes three non-equivalent relationships: direct suppression by mitochondria-derived signals, parallel emergence under shared selective pressures, and reverse causation in which immune exclusion itself facilitates mitochondrial adaptation. Within this framework, we synthesize evidence that mitochondrial adaptations support residual disease through OXPHOS dependence, mitochondrial dynamics, mitophagy, redox control, and metabolite-driven epigenetic remodeling, while concurrently reshaping T-cell, macrophage, and dendritic-cell function through lactate and acid stress, succinate, fumarate, 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), adenosine, and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)-dependent innate immune signaling. We further highlight key determinants that influence whether mtDNA-STING signaling becomes immunogenic or suppressive, including timing, cell source, subcellular localization, and the dominant responding immune compartment. Finally, we discuss translational strategies to disrupt this mitochondria-immune interface, with emphasis on host and tumor heterogeneity, biomarker-guided selection, and treatment timing when combining with chemotherapy, mitochondrial targeting, and immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.