ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Multimodal EEG and explainable machine learning characterize neuroticism-related neurodynamic heterogeneity in mild cognitive impairment during visuospatial working memory.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As a personality trait associated with emotional instability and negative emotional tendencies, neuroticism is considered to be closely related to the risk of cognitive decline in old age. However, the neurodynamic abnormalities associated with elevated neuroticism among individuals with MCI remain unclear. Methods: Cognitive screening based in the community was performed in Zhumadian, Henan Province, and Xingtai, Hebei Province, China. Based on converted scores on the Neuroticism subscale of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, individuals with MCI were categorized into high-neuroticism MCI (HN-MCI) and non-elevated neuroticism MCI (NEN-MCI) groups. After EEG recruitment, behavioral-task completion, EEG quality control, and frequency matching by sex, age, and years of education, 53 participants with HN-MCI and 53 with NEN-MCI were included. All participants engaged in a modified visuospatial working memory test during the recording of 64-channel EEG data. Behavioral measures, event-related potentials, time-frequency power, phase-amplitude coupling, and dwPLI-based functional connectivity features were extracted. A stacking ensemble learning model integrated with SHAP-based interpretability analysis was employed for multimodal feature fusion and classification. Results: In comparison to the NEN-MCI group, the HN-MCI group exhibited lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total and visuospatial/executive scores, prolonged reaction times, and elevated inverse efficiency scores. EEG analyses indicated increased P2 and P3 amplitudes, reduced N2 amplitude, increased theta activity, enhanced theta-to-low-alpha phase-amplitude coupling, and reinforced theta-band functional connectivity in the HN-MCI group. The stacking model differentiated the two groups with an AUC of 0.858, and permutation testing indicated that model performance was significantly above chance (permutation Conclusion: Individuals with HN-MCI exhibit multilevel neurodynamic abnormalities across temporal, spectral, cross-frequency, and network domains during visuospatial working memory processing, accompanied by impaired visuospatial/executive function and reduced behavioral efficiency. Neuroticism-related emotional traits may contribute to a sustained high-load and low-efficiency neural processing pattern in individuals with MCI. Multimodal EEG combined with explainable machine learning provides a useful framework for characterizing personality-related neurodynamic heterogeneity in MCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.