ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2026
Association of QRS Notch Resolution During LV-Only Fusion Pacing With Early Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB); however, many patients remain non-responders. Identifying effective electrical resynchronization early remains an important clinical need. Objective: To investigate the association between resolution of V5-V6 R-wave notching/slurring during left ventricular-only pacing (LV-only pacing), combined with an LV-only pacing percentage ≥ 50% at 1 month, and early left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients with complete LBBB (CLBBB) undergoing CRT. Methods: We retrospectively studied 49 patients with CLBBB who underwent CRT. Patients with resolution of V5-V6 R-wave notching/slurring during LV-only pacing at implantation and an LV-only pacing percentage ≥ 50% at 1 month were classified as the R-Notch Resolution group; all others were classified as the Non-R-Notch Resolution group. The primary endpoint was left ventricular reverse remodeling at 1 month, defined as a ≥ 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) from baseline. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associated factors. Results: Fifteen patients were classified into the R-Notch Resolution group and 34 into the Non-R-Notch Resolution group. One-month left ventricular reverse remodeling occurred more frequently in the R-Notch Resolution group (80.0% vs. 47.1%). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, R-Notch Resolution group status remained independently associated with 1-month left ventricular reverse remodeling. Conclusion: Resolution of V5-V6 R-wave notching/slurring during LV-only pacing, combined with an LV-only pacing percentage ≥ 50% at 1 month, was independently associated with early left ventricular reverse remodeling after CRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.