Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42577902›Full record

ArticlePublic health challenges2026

Determinants of Pregnancy-Related Misconceptions Among Pregnant Women in Urban Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Tasnima Siddiquee, Bishwajit Bhowmik, Sanjida Binte Munir, Hafiza Nasrin, Tanjimul Islam, Purobi Rani Debnath, Fahmida Mahmud, Liya Quamrun Nesa, Tamanna Afroz, Shamima Akhtar and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health challenges, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01924013 (Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial of Maternal Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy and Lactation to Improve Infant Linear Growth in Dhaka, Bangladesh.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01924013 phase3completednot on this map

Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial of Maternal Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy and Lactation to Improve Infant Linear Growth in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenRan2014 to 2018Enrolled1,300ConditionsPregnancyArmsVitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tasnima SiddiqueeCentre for Global Health Research Diabetic Association of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
Bishwajit BhowmikCentre for Global Health Research Diabetic Association of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1114-5873
Sanjida Binte MunirCentre for Global Health Research Diabetic Association of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
Hafiza NasrinCentre for Global Health Research Diabetic Association of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
Tanjimul IslamCentre for Global Health Research Diabetic Association of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
Purobi Rani DebnathDepartment of Ophthalmology Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetes Dhaka Bangladesh.
Fahmida MahmudCentre for Global Health Research Diabetic Association of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
Liya Quamrun NesaCentre for Global Health Research Diabetic Association of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
Tamanna AfrozCentre for Global Health Research Diabetic Association of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
Shamima AkhtarCentre for Global Health Research Diabetic Association of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
Farsana Rahman KhanCentre for Global Health Research Diabetic Association of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
Shamim KhanCentre for Global Health Research Diabetic Association of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
Arifur Rahman KhanCentre for Global Health Research Diabetic Association of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.
Graham A HitmanBlizard Institute Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary University of London London UK.
A K Azad KhanCentre for Global Health Research Diabetic Association of Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnancy-related misconceptions are common in low- and middle-income countries and may adversely influence maternal behaviours. Evidence from urban populations is limited. This study assessed the prevalence and determinants of pregnancy-related misconceptions among pregnant women in urban Bangladesh. Methods: A cross-sectional baseline analysis was conducted among 861 first-trimester pregnant women (6-14 weeks) from urban and semi-urban Dhaka, Bangladesh (2014-2015). Only pre-intervention data from a registered trial were used. A pre-tested, interviewer-administered questionnaire assessed nine misconceptions. Correct responses were scored 1 (0-9); 'do not know' was scored incorrect. Scores were categorised as poor (0-3), average (4-6) or good (7-9). Multivariable logistic regression identified determinants of good knowledge. Results: The mean knowledge score was 4.9 ± 2.1. Only 13.8% of participants had good knowledge, whereas 73.3% and 12.9% had average and poor knowledge, respectively. Misconceptions were most common regarding diabetes (65.2%), consumption of oily foods during pregnancy (61.4%) and physical activity (30.5%). Women with more than 10 years of education were significantly more likely to have good knowledge than those with lower educational attainment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-3.63; Conclusion: Pregnancy-related misconceptions remain widespread among pregnant women in urban Bangladesh. Maternal education is the key determinant of accurate knowledge, underscoring the need for culturally appropriate antenatal education and community-based interventions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01924013.

Indexed as

antenatal careBangladeshhealth beliefsmaternal knowledgepregnancy misconceptionspublic healthsocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID42577902
PMCPMC13455545

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.