Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42578468›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Association between frailty and clinical outcomes in critically ill coronary artery disease patients: A retrospective cohort study.

Mengxiao Wang, Chengjian Guan, Qianli Ma, Shaotong Zhang, Qian Chen, Bing Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mengxiao WangDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.
Chengjian GuanDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.
Qianli MaDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.
Shaotong ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.
Qian ChenDepartment of Physiology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.
Bing XiaoDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9526-4575

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveFrailty is prevalent in cardiovascular disease but lacks objective assessment tools in critical care. This study evaluated the association between the Frailty Index based on laboratory data (FI-LAB) at ICU admission and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from the MIMIC-IV and MIMIC-III Carevue databases. Patients were stratified by FI-LAB into mild (<0.25), moderate (0.25-0.4), and severe (>0.4) frailty. Multivariable logistic regression assessed in-hospital mortality, Cox models evaluated 28-day and 1-year mortality, and Fine-Gray competing risk models examined malignant arrhythmia. Dose-response relationships and subgroup effects were also assessed.ResultsAfter full adjustment, severe frailty was associated with elevated in-hospital mortality (OR = 4.41, 95% CI: 2.60-7.48,

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCritical IllnessFrailtyAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorscoronary artery diseasefrailty indexlaboratory testmalignant arrhythmiaMIMIC databasemortality

Identifiers

PMID42578468
PMCPMC13462486

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.