Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Automated intermittent olfactory stimulation to reduce apnea in preterm infants: results of the PREMODEUR randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02851979 (PREMODEUR. "Odors to Insufflate Life". Implementation of a Controlled Olfactory Sensorial Method to Decrease Apneas in Premature Newborns. Proof of Concept Study. Latin-square Open Study With Blind Evaluation of Primary Outcome.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PREMODEUR. "Odors to Insufflate Life". Implementation of a Controlled Olfactory Sensorial Method to Decrease Apneas in Premature Newborns. Proof of Concept Study. Latin-square Open Study With Blind Evaluation of Primary Outcome.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apnea of prematurity is a frequent clinical complication in very preterm infants. Olfactory stimulation has been proposed as a complementary nonpharmacological strategy to reduce apnea episodes, although previous studies have shown methodological limitations. The PREMODEUR study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of automated intermittent olfactory stimulation using three distinct odorants (mint, grapefruit, and vanilla) in reducing central apnea in preterm infants. This randomized Latin-square crossover trial included 15 preterm infants born before 33 weeks of gestation with respiratory instability (≥ 3 pathological apneas/day). Infants were exposed to three 24-h conditions: no stimulation (S0), sham stimulation with nonodorized air (S1), and olfactory stimulation (S2). The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of central apnea episodes, analyzed using a mixed-effects Poisson model. The primary analysis showed no significant difference between S1 and S2 (IRR = 1.04, 95% confidence interval [0.85-1.28]; p = 0.689). An exploratory post hoc sensitivity analysis excluding one influential participant (01-004) yielded a lower apnea incidence under S2 (IRR = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [0.60-0.97]; p = 0.0254). Because this finding depended on excluding a single participant, it should be interpreted with caution.
conclusionAutomated intermittent olfactory stimulation did not significantly reduce apnea incidence in the primary analysis. Given the limited sample size, a modest treatment effect cannot be excluded; however, the exploratory post hoc analysis does not provide confirmatory evidence of efficacy. These findings may help inform the design of larger, adequately powered trials with earlier recruitment and predefined subgroup analyses.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02851979. Prospectively registered on 2 August 2016. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Olfactory stimulation, particularly with vanilla, has been proposed to reduce apnea in preterm infants, but previous studies were limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous protocols, continuous exposure, and limited use of sham controls. WHAT IS NEW: • PREMODEUR shows that automated intermittent olfactory stimulation with sham-controlled objective monitoring is feasible in neonatal intensive care, with no adverse events observed. The neutral primary finding, together with the sensitivity of exploratory analyses to individual variability, may inform the design of future adequately powered trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42579164What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.