Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42579329›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2026

A Short Questionnaire for Evaluating Mediterranean Diet Adherence and Nutritional Sustainability: Validation in Turkish Adults.

Neslişah Rakıcıoğlu, Rüveyda Esra Özkalaycı, Canan Altınsoy

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neslişah RakıcıoğluDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8763-7407
Rüveyda Esra ÖzkalaycıDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7564-4017
Canan AltınsoyDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1188-0475

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Short Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and Nutritional Sustainability (MedQ-Sus), which excludes alcohol consumption and simultaneously assesses adherence to the Mediterranean diet and a sustainable diet, in adults.

methodsThe study included 138 adults, of whom 39.9% were male and 60.1% were female, with a mean age of 34.3 ± 12.7 years. The MedQ-Sus is a brief questionnaire that generates a Mediterranean Diet score and a Sustainable Diet score from the same eight food-group consumption data using different scoring criteria. Dietary intake was assessed using 3-day food records. Validity was evaluated by comparing the MedQ-Sus scores with corresponding food-group and nutrient intakes derived from the food records and by examining construct validity using a modified alternate Mediterranean Diet score (aMED) and the Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI). Associations and agreement were assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on absolute agreement, as appropriate. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in 71 randomly selected participants 4 weeks after the initial administration.

resultsStatistically significant and positive correlations were found between the consumption levels of all food groups associated with the Mediterranean Diet score components. The Sustainable Diet score showed positive correlations with all food groups except legumes and fresh fruits (p < 0.05). The strongest relationship for both the Mediterranean Diet score (r = 0.490) and the Sustainable Diet score (r = 0.488) was observed in the consumption of fish and fish products (p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis indicated an acceptable level of agreement between the MedQ-Sus scores and the corresponding estimates derived from the food records. As adherence levels measured by the MedQ-Sus increased, intakes of fish, olive oil, dietary fibre, magnesium, zinc, monounsaturated fatty acids, and omega-3 fatty acids increased, whereas polyunsaturated fatty acid intake decreased. In the test-retest analysis, strong positive correlations were observed for the Mediterranean Diet score (r = 0.782) and the Sustainable Diet score (r = 0.813) (both p < 0.001).

conclusionThe MedQ-Sus demonstrated good validity and reliability as a practical screening tool for simultaneously assessing adherence to the Mediterranean diet and adherence to a sustainable diet among the adults included in this study, while its exclusion of alcohol consumption may support its use across different adult population groups.

Indexed as

Diet, MediterraneanPatient ComplianceAdultDiet RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition AssessmentReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyYoung Adultmediterranean dietMedQ‐Susreliabilityscreening toolsustainable dietvalidity

Identifiers

PMID42579329
PMCPMC13460384

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.