ReviewAmerican journal of botany2026
Genomics is modifying our concepts of evolution in homosporous and heterosporous vascular plants.
Review in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomics is modifying our concepts of evolution in homosporous and heterosporous vascular plants.American journal of botany · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Across the tree of life, and particularly within land plants, there is a wide diversity and disparity of genome structure. The most well-studied are angiosperms, comprising mostly small and dynamic genomes, with a history of ancient whole genome duplications. Genome structure and evolution have historically been less clear in ferns and lycophytes, and the origin of their large genomes and high chromosome numbers has been debated for decades, centering on differences in reproductive mode (heterospory and homospory). Klekowski (1973) hypothesized that homosporous ferns and lycophytes were mainly inbreeding and that polyploidy allowed for higher genetic diversity via homoeologous heterozygosity. In contrast, Haufler (1987) and others proposed that homosporous ferns and lycophytes had diploid inheritance and outcrossed frequently, a theory supported by genetic crossing, isozymes, and modern comparative genomic analyses. This article summarizes past and current theories on the mechanisms of genome evolution in homosporous plants, highlights the contributions of comparative genomics to this field in the past two decades, and discusses what we may be able to learn by considering the role of meiosis in heterosporous and homosporous fern and lycophyte genome structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.