Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42579673›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Drug sensitivity prediction across cancer types using graph isomorphism networks and biological pathway features: A dual-branch deep learning approach.

Shuang Li, Quanzhong Yang, Feifei Shen, Wei Chen, Shuya Zhang, Xinyi Dong, Weikai Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shuang LiInstitute of Medical Technology, Luoyang Polytechnic, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Quanzhong YangInstitute of Medical Technology, Luoyang Polytechnic, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Feifei ShenInstitute of Medical Technology, Luoyang Polytechnic, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Wei ChenInstitute of Medical Technology, Luoyang Polytechnic, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Shuya ZhangInstitute of Medical Technology, Luoyang Polytechnic, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Xinyi DongInstitute of Medical Technology, Luoyang Polytechnic, Luoyang, Henan, China.
Weikai ZhangInstitute of Medical Technology, Luoyang Polytechnic, Luoyang, Henan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3336-4509

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug sensitivity prediction is an important issue within the precision medicine field. IC50, which is the molar drug dose needed to decrease the viability of cells by half compared to the drug-free control, is the main pharmacodynamics parameter used for drug sensitivity analysis in large-scale pharmacogenomics screenings. Computational estimation of IC50s based on molecular and genomic factors significantly reduces costs associated with experiments for measuring cell viability and allows for accelerating the process of drug discovery. Traditional methods of IC50 calculation do not allow integrating the three-dimensional chemical structure of drugs and the biological context of particular cell lines, resulting in suboptimal model performance when using different pharmacogenomics data sources. In this work, we propose an innovative dual-branch approach based on Graph Isomorphism Network (GIN) drug representations coupled with a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) for 50-dimensional ssGSEA pathway activities calculated from CCLE gene expression. After training on cell-line-drug pair combinations from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer 2 (GDSC2) dataset across various cancers, the proposed GIN+Pathway MLP model attains an R2 of 0.8553 and a Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) of 0.9249 on the testing split of the same dataset. In a variant ablation study of six variants, we find that eliminating the pathway MLP component lowers the R2 value by more than 0.15, thus proving the importance of biological features in the two-branch model. The performance of our proposed model exceeds benchmark scores for models such as GraphDRP (PCC = 0.870, R2 = 0.756) and DeepCDR (PCC = 0.847, R2 = 0.720) when tested on the same GDSC2 dataset.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDeep LearningDrug Resistance, NeoplasmNeoplasmsCell Line, TumorGraph Neural NetworksHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Multilayer PerceptronsPharmacogeneticsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID42579673
PMCPMC13460681

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.