ReviewPoultry science2026
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats‑associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) based genome editing in avian primordial germ cells: Comparative technologies, translational applications, and regulatory challenges.
Review in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primordial germ cells (PGCs) are a unique platform for heritable gene editing in avian species, because they allow easy isolation, culture, and can then be reintroduced into the host. CRISPR/Cas9 technologies have advanced avian genome editing by enabling targeted editing of genes and traits for production, health, reproduction, and welfare. This review critically evaluates genome-editing tools in avian PGCs, including CRISPR/Cas9, transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), base editing, and prime editing. Germline transmission efficiency, suitability, precision, and heritability are compared. Efficiency, cytotoxicity, and translational feasibility of delivery strategies, including viral vectors, electroporation and the use of ribonucleoproteins are assessed. Applications of these techniques in chickens are for muscle growth via myostatin (MSTN) gene disruption, viral resistance via editing of the sodium/hydrogen exchanger 1 (NHE1) gene, and control of male and female ratios through modification of sex determination genes. Additionally, applications in biopharmaceutical protein production and animal biodiversity conservation are also explored. Despite advances, some limitations remain, including low efficiency of homology-directed repair, off-target effects, mosaicism, and variability in transmission through the germ line. Current evidence demonstrates a significant lack of germline validation and scalability creating barriers to translate this potential into commercial avian production, especially, poultry breeding. Regulatory frameworks and their implications for food and commercialization are also discussed. Future research should prioritize precision editing, scalable delivery systems, and regulatory alignment to enable practical, ethical, and responsible implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.