Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581162›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

Cannabis Use Among Veterans Versus Non-Veterans in the USA, 2016-2023: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Vuong V Do, Nhung Nguyen, Pamela M Ling, Salomeh Keyhani, Alison S Rustagi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vuong V DoCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. vuong.do@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2140-9772
Nhung NguyenCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Pamela M LingCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Salomeh KeyhaniCenter for Data to Discovery and Delivery Innovation (3DI), San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alison S RustagiDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Identifying older adults who benefit from lung cancer screeningR03AG082924 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI RUSTAGI, ALISON SILVIS · 2023 to 2024
$307k
CSRD VA IK2 CX002713NIA NIH HHS R03 AG082924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVeterans have a unique health profile and risk for substance use, but few studies compare cannabis use patterns among US military Veterans and non-veteran civilians.

objectiveTo examine differences in age-specific patterns, modes of use, and sociodemographic correlates of cannabis use between Veterans and non-Veterans. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, MEASURES: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 2016 to 2023. The analytic sample included 907,136 adults aged 18 to 80 years with complete data on self-reported veteran status and cannabis use. Primary outcomes were past 30-day cannabis use (yes/no), frequency of use in the past 30 days, and inhalational vs. non-inhalational use methods. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess sociodemographic and behavioral correlates of cannabis use. Analyses were conducted from March to June 2025.

resultsAmong participants, 114,193 (12.6%) were Veterans. Although overall cannabis use was lower among Veterans than non-Veterans, age-specific patterns differed. Veterans aged 50-64 years were 43% (95% CI, 28-59%) more likely to report cannabis use than non-Veterans, and those aged 65-80 were 22% (95% CI, 9-37%) more likely. Older Veterans also reported more frequent cannabis use in the past 30 days (mean 18.4 versus 15.8 days among those aged 50-64 years; 17.3 vs. 14.5 days among those aged 65-80 years). Inhalational use was more common among Veterans than non-Veterans (90.0%; 95% CI, 87.8-91.9% vs. 83.7%; 95% CI, 82.5-84.9%). Some correlates of cannabis use were shared across groups; however, educational attainment was differentially associated with cannabis use by veteran status.

conclusionsVeterans aged ≥ 50 years were more likely to report cannabis use and used it more frequently than their non-veteran peers, suggesting they may need tailored interventions to address cannabis use.

Indexed as

BRFSScannabis usesubstance useVA healthVeterans

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.