Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581378›Full record

ArticleFungal biology and biotechnology2026

Fungal morphotype detection and quantification in microscopic images with TU_MyCo-vision: a user-friendly deep learning object detection tool.

Kartik J Deopujari, Matthias Schmal, Caroline Danner, Zainab Abdul Qayyum, Jordy T Zwerus, Julian Kopp, Mihail Besleaga, Roghayeh Shirvani, Astrid R Mach-Aigner, Robert L Mach and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal biology and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kartik J DeopujariInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Gumpendorfer Strasse 1a, Wien, 1060, Austria.
Matthias SchmalInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Gumpendorfer Strasse 1a, Wien, 1060, Austria.
Caroline DannerInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Gumpendorfer Strasse 1a, Wien, 1060, Austria.
Zainab Abdul QayyumInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Gumpendorfer Strasse 1a, Wien, 1060, Austria.
Jordy T ZwerusInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Gumpendorfer Strasse 1a, Wien, 1060, Austria.
Julian KoppInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Gumpendorfer Strasse 1a, Wien, 1060, Austria.
Mihail BesleagaInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Gumpendorfer Strasse 1a, Wien, 1060, Austria.
Roghayeh ShirvaniInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Gumpendorfer Strasse 1a, Wien, 1060, Austria.
Astrid R Mach-AignerInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Gumpendorfer Strasse 1a, Wien, 1060, Austria.
Robert L MachInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Gumpendorfer Strasse 1a, Wien, 1060, Austria.
Christian ZimmermannInstitute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Gumpendorfer Strasse 1a, Wien, 1060, Austria. christian.zimmermann@tuwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphological switching in response to environmental stimuli is a well-known phenomenon in fungi, leading to diverse morphotypes. Microscopic observation remains a widely used approach to study these phenotypes, but variation in sample preparation and operator skill can limit the scale of sample processing or introduce operator bias. Although several image-based cell detection tools have been developed, most are tailored to specific applications or limited to a particular taxon. To address the need for a tool applicable to the polymorphic, yeast-like fungus Aureobasidium pullulans, and with potential applicability to other taxa, we developed TU_MyCo-Vision, an Ultralytics YOLO (You Only Look Once) based object detection tool for identifying 13 fungal morphotypes in bright-field microscopic images. Identification of 13 fungal morphotypes, including variation of vacuolated single cells, cells with granular cytoplasmic appearance, and diverse hyphal forms, is achieved by integrating a YOLOv11m-based object detector trained on a custom dataset of 1,504 annotated images and a standalone graphical user interface that enables downstream data analysis and visualization of results. The best-performing model (Zulu_s3) achieved a mean precision of 73.4%, a recall of 66.5%, a mean average precision at 50% IoU (mAP@50) of 73.5%, and a mean average precision at varying IoU thresholds between 50 and 90% IoU (mAP@50-95) of 54.5% across all 13 classes. The single-group analysis pipeline was validated on a 90-image test set, generating six quantitative summaries that capture the distribution and co-occurrence of fungal morphotypes, including absolute counts, relative and mean relative abundance plots, stacked bar plots and clustered heatmaps. Multi-group evaluation on previously unseen datasets comprising Candida albicans, Komagataella phaffi, and Aspergillus niger spores demonstrated that these morphotype profiles can be compared across biologically distinct genera, highlighting the tool's potential applicability for studying fungal morphological diversity.

Indexed as

Aureobasidium pullulansAutomated image analysisBrightfield microscopyDeep learningFungal morphologyYOLO object detection

Identifiers

PMID42581378
PMCPMC13459361

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.