Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581617›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2026

Prediction of Overall Survival in Patients With Oesophageal Cancer Using AI-Based 3D CT Body Composition Analysis.

Christian Römer, Jens Hölzen, Andreas Pascher, Walter Heindel, Marc-David Künnemann, René Hosch, Katarzyna Borys, Gesa Helen Pöhler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian RömerClinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster and University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4386-9323
Jens HölzenDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster and University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1720-8943
Andreas PascherDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster and University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Walter HeindelClinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster and University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6562-280X
Marc-David KünnemannClinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster and University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4963-0989
René HoschInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1760-2342
Katarzyna BorysInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6987-6041
Gesa Helen PöhlerClinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster and University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3994-1495

Funding

German Netzwerk Universitätsmedizin 3.0 01KX2524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOesophageal cancer remains the sixth most lethal malignancy, with 5-year survival rates around 22%. CT-derived 2D body composition analysis has emerged as a promising prognostic tool, but conventional, often manually created single-slice L3 measurements are unsuited for future clinical implementation. We evaluated fully automated AI-derived volumetric body composition indices as prognostic parameters using conventional L3 and BMI measurements as reference.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients with histologically confirmed oesophageal cancer treated between 2011 and 2024. Automated deep learning segmentation using the nnU-Net-based body and organ analysis pipeline quantified abdominal tissue volumes from staging CTs. Three normalized indices were calculated: sarcopenia index (SI, muscle/bone volume ratio), myosteatotic fat index (MFI, intramuscular/total adipose tissue volume ratio) and abdominal fat index (AFI, visceral/subcutaneous adipose tissue volume ratio). Cox proportional hazards models assessed prognostic value after sequential adjustment for age, sex, metastatic status, ECOG performance status, BMI and L3-derived indices. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated survival differences stratified by sex-specific median values.

resultsThe cohort comprised 563 patients (19.7% female), median age 65.4 years (IQR: 58.8-71.3); 10.1% (n = 57) had metastatic disease and 68.7% (n = 387) underwent surgery. Males had higher sarcopenia index (2.54 ± 0.41 vs. 2.24 ± 0.45, p < 0.001) and abdominal fat index (median 0.72 vs. 0.36, p < 0.001), whereas MFI showed no difference (p = 0.89). During median follow-up of 22 months, 367 deaths (65.9%) occurred. Median overall survival was 28.6 months (95% CI: 23.7-33.3); 1-year survival 70.7% (95% CI: 67.2%-74.8%) and 5-year survival 32.8% (95% CI: 29.6%-38.3%), with marked differences by metastatic status (M0 vs. M1 1-year survival: 73.4% vs. 46.4%). In the fully adjusted model incorporating all three volumetric indices alongside clinical covariates, BMI and L3-derived parameters (n = 532), only sarcopenia index retained independent significance (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37-0.82, p = 0.003); all others showed p ≥ 0.26. Metastatic status (HR = 2.23, p < 0.001) and ECOG (HR = 1.29, p < 0.001) remained significant. All L3 indices lost significance alongside volumetric parameters (p > 0.14). Male patients with high sarcopenia index showed longer survival compared with patients with low sarcopenia index (33.3 vs. 21.8 months, p < 0.001); female patients showed larger descriptive contrasts (68.8 vs. 16.8 months, p < 0.001) that were formally confirmed by a significant sex-SI Cox interaction (LRT p = 0.026).

conclusionsAutomatic AI-derived volumetric body composition parameters calculated from routine staging CTs predict overall survival in patients with oesophageal cancer and are associated with sex-related differences of prognostic impact, supporting further evaluation toward future clinical use.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBody CompositionEsophageal NeoplasmsImaging, Three-DimensionalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective Studiesartificial intelligencebody compositioncomputed tomographymyosteatosisoesophageal cancersarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID42581617
PMCPMC13462676

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.