ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
IRF1 mediates airway epithelial innate memory through priming BRD4- EP300 activity.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Sentinel cells of the airway epithelium are repetitively exposed to RNA virus infections. Here, the production of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) activates the innate immune response (IIR), inducing antiviral defenses, activating adaptive immunity and stimulating epithelial repair. The question whether repeated exposures produce innate "memory", where heightened inflammatory and injury/repair responses are produced upon subsequent exposure, is unknown. Methods: We establish a reproducible model of innate memory in tumor protein (TP63)+/keratin (KRT)5+ human small airway basal epithelial cells by repetitive activation of the Toll like receptor (TLR3) pathway (a.k.a. "training"). Mechanisms of IRF1-dependent target gene remodeling are investigated by CRISPR/Cas9 knockdown, chromatin immunoprecipitation, co-immunoprecipitation and through use of selective inhibitors of the BRD4 chromatin remodeling complex (CRC). Results: We observe "training" increases basal expression of a network of intrinsic IIR genes, reducing Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) replication upon subsequent exposure. In addition, trained hSAECs enter an epithelial mesenchymal plasticity (EMP) program, characterized by cell shape changes, increased expression of cytoplasmic vimentin and core mesenchymal regulators. Mechanistically, we find that Interferon Regulatory Factor 1 (IRF1) is required for innate memory because IRF1-deficient cells fail to activate basal intrinsic IIR. In TLR3 activation, IRF1 is incorporated into the bromodomain containing protein 4 (BRD4) chromatin remodeling complex (CRC), a complex containing the histone H3 acetyltransferase, EP300/p300. In acute TLR3 activation, the binding of BRD4 is increased on intrinsic IIR promoters, yet this binding is unaffected by training. Instead, we find training induces EP300 binding and increases H3K27 acetylation (H3K27ac) at these regions. Small molecule inhibitors show that BRD4 is required for establishing innate memory and H3K27ac accumulation. Finally, we find that training enhances BRD4-EP300 interactions and that memory-induced H3K27ac formation is EP300-dependent. Conclusions: We conclude that hSAECs acquire innate memory through IRF1 coupling with the BRD4-EP300 CRC to activate intrinsic IIR and cell-state transition genes. Our data suggest that innate training is the consequence of dynamic BRD4 CRC interactions through enhanced EP300 recruitment that primes transcriptional responsiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.