ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Kinetic study of glyphosate biodegradation by actinobacterial consortium RH1: implications for bioremediation.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The excessive use of glyphosate herbicide in agriculture adversely affects the environment and soil health. Bioremediation using microbial consortia offers an efficient approach for transforming pesticides into less harmful products. Objectives: The study investigated glyphosate biodegradation by the RH1 consortium and identified suitable kinetic models to support bioremediation. Methods: Glyphosate biodegradation was investigated at concentrations of 1-200 mg/L using the RH1 microbial consortium comprising four Results: Following 15 days of incubation under optimized conditions, the RH1 consortium achieved high glyphosate removal efficiencies of 92.2%, 87.2%, 91.72%, 92.06%, 54.11%, and 37.085% at initial concentrations of 1, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 200 mg/L, respectively. Notably, at 50 mg/L the consortium demonstrated the highest degradation rate compared with pure-culture treatments. Kinetic evaluation indicated that the Haldane-Andrews model best described the degradation behavior (F = 65.49, P = 0.00074, Conclusion: The RH1 actinobacterial consortium efficiently degraded glyphosate, fitting best to the Haldane-Andrews kinetic model. Significant TOC reduction and ATR-FTIR-confirmed structural changes indicate effective glyphosate transformation, highlighting RH1's potential for bioremediation of glyphosate-contaminated soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.