ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Biodistribution, shedding, and transmissibility of vusolimogene oderparepvec (RP1).
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vusolimogene oderparepvec (RP1) is an intratumorally administered, genetically modified herpes simplex virus type-1 derived oncolytic immunotherapy designed to selectively replicate in tumors and stimulate systemic antitumor immunity. We evaluated the biodistribution, shedding, and potential for transmission of RP1 in patients with skin cancers treated in the IGNYTE clinical trial and assessed close-contact exposure across all RP1 clinical studies. Methods: Patients received intratumoral RP1 in combination with nivolumab, with serial collection of blood, urine, injection-site, dressing, and oral mucosal samples during treatment and follow-up. RP1 DNA was quantified by polymerase chain reaction, and swab samples positive for RP1 DNA were tested for replication-competent RP1. Reports of herpetic infection in patients and close contacts were also systematically collected. Results: Among 282 treated patients, RP1 DNA was detected most frequently at injection sites, with substantially lower incidence and levels in other sample types. Detection declined rapidly after treatment completion, with no RP1 DNA detected in blood or urine during follow-up. Replication-competent RP1 was detected rarely and only at low titers, only at injection sites. No systemic herpes simplex virus infections occurred in patients, and no herpetic infections were reported among caregivers or close contacts. Interpretation: RP1 is largely confined to injection sites, shedding of live RP1 is rare and transient. No evidence of transmission of RP1 was observed. These findings support the favorable biosafety profile of RP1 with only a negligible risk of environmental release or secondary transmission during clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.