ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Grip strength as a translational biomarker for peripheral nerve injury and recovery.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A central challenge in peripheral nerve injury care is determining whether an in-continuity injury will recover spontaneously or require early surgical intervention. This determination currently depends on serial observation, during which the window for effective intervention may narrow. This Perspective discusses grip strength as a translational biomarker for peripheral nerve injury and recovery, with emphasis on rodent forelimb nerve injury models. In both rats and human patients, grip strength can be used to assess whether a motor nerve can activate its target muscle sufficiently to generate force. This shared functional endpoint gives grip strength particular translational value and distinguishes it from many preclinical functional assays used only in animal research. In rodent models of in-continuity nerve stretch injury, structurally distinct injury grades have produced markedly different grip strength recovery profiles over time, linking structural injury severity to long-term functional outcomes. Grip strength has also served as a primary functional endpoint for evaluating intraoperative electrical stimulation as an early prognostic tool and for measuring treatment effects after nerve injury. The grasping test offers a practical, reliable and low-cost method for quantifying forelimb motor recovery, but broader adoption will require standardization of testing protocols and reporting. Grip strength should not be interpreted in isolation, as it reflects the combined function of nerve signaling and target muscle force generation. Instead, it is most informative when combined with histological, electrophysiological, sensory, imaging, and clinical assessments. Standardized use of grip strength may therefore improve the translational relevance of preclinical nerve injury research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.