ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Cross-national predictive correlates of depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older adults with chronic conditions: an explainable machine learning analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rapid population aging has made depression among middle-aged and older adults an increasingly important public health concern. Although numerous risk factors have been identified, an integrative framework for clarifying how these risks are structured across sociocultural contexts remains lacking. Identifying cross-nationally stable vulnerability signals is therefore important for improving screening and prevention. This study aimed to identify cross-nationally stable and context-specific predictive correlates of depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older adults with at least one chronic condition using an explainable machine-learning framework. Methods: Data were drawn from six international longitudinal cohorts-CHARLS, ELSA, HRS, KLoSA, MHAS, and SHARE-including 84,140 participants aged 50 years or older who reported at least one chronic condition. Within an explainable artificial intelligence framework, six predictive algorithms were evaluated: LR, RF, SVM, MLP, XGBoost, and EBM. SMOTE was used to address class imbalance, and SHAP analysis was applied to characterize the hierarchical structure of risk determinants. Results: The models achieved moderate predictive performance across cohorts, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values ranging from 0.77 to 0.80. Explainable boosting machine and logistic regression performed nearly identically in most cohorts, with absolute AUC differences below 0.005 in five of six cohorts. A set of cross-nationally stable predictive correlates was identified, among which poor self-rated health, pain burden, and limitations in activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living were the most influential predictors. Conversely, demographic and socioeconomic factors showed greater cross-national heterogeneity, indicating that depression risk is shaped by both shared and context-specific influences. Conclusions: By integrating large-scale international cohort data with explainable machine learning, this study identified cross-national patterns of feature importance for concurrent depressive symptom status among middle-aged and older adults with chronic conditions. Poor self-rated health, somatic pain, and functional limitations may support cross-sectional screening and further assessment but should not be interpreted as early warning indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.