ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Therapeutic strategies for spinal muscular atrophy: the history and future perspective.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a devastating autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder characterized by progressive degeneration of lower motor neurons, leading to muscle weakness and atrophy predominantly manifesting in childhood. The disease is caused by homozygous deletion or loss-of-function mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene, with the nearly identical SMN2 gene acting as a critical modifier of disease severity. Since the initial clinical descriptions in 1891 and the identification of the causative gene in 1995, the field has witnessed transformative therapeutic progress. The FDA approval of nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide targeting SMN2 splicing, in 2016 marked the first disease-modifying therapy, followed by the gene replacement therapy onasemnogene abeparvovec in 2019 and the orally administered small-molecule splicing modifier risdiplam in 2020. These SMN-targeted therapies have substantially improved survival and motor outcomes, particularly when administered presymptomatically as enabled by increasingly widespread newborn screening programs. However, a significant proportion of patients, especially those with later-onset disease and adults, show limited responses, and existing therapies cannot reverse established neurodegeneration or muscle pathology. In this review, we trace the history of SMA research and therapy development, critically compare the three approved treatments, and discuss key unresolved challenges including treatment-switching criteria, management of late-diagnosed patients, and the emerging role of biomarkers such as neurofilament light chain and compound muscle action potential. We further explore non-SMN therapeutic strategies targeting PTEN, plastin 3, neurocalcin delta, myostatin, and neuroinflammation, and examine the rationale for combination approaches that integrate SMN restoration with muscle- and neuro-protective agents. Finally, we address future directions encompassing precision medicine, next-generation gene editing, and biomarker-driven trial design. While SMA has been transformed from a fatal childhood disorder to a treatable condition, a definitive cure for all patients remains the goal of ongoing and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.