ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Case Report: Pharmacological decision-making in pregnant women with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: two contrasting clinical scenarios.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that predominantly affects women of reproductive age. Pregnancy requires careful pharmacological decision-making because maternal relapse can lead to severe neurological disability, while fetal exposure to immunosuppressive therapy remains an important safety concern. Case presentation: We report two contrasting clinical scenarios in pregnant women with NMOSD. Case 1 involved a 30-year-old primigravida with AQP4-IgG-negative NMOSD and weak isolated MOG-IgA positivity of uncertain clinical significance. At 11 weeks of gestation, she developed a disabling relapse with severe bilateral lower-limb weakness, sensory disturbance, inability to walk independently, and urinary dysfunction. High-dose intravenous methylprednisolone led to partial recovery. After multidisciplinary counseling, she chose pregnancy termination at 18+3 weeks because of residual disability, concerns about fetal drug exposure, possible need for further immunosuppression, and anticipated rehabilitation burden. Case 2 involved a 35-year-old primigravida with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD who had been clinically stable for approximately 1 year before conception while receiving prednisolone 10 mg/day and azathioprine 50 mg/day. This regimen was continued during pregnancy with neurological, obstetric, and clinical pharmacology monitoring. She remained relapse-free and delivered a healthy female infant at 38 weeks. The infant weighed 3,100 g, had Apgar scores of 10, 10, and 10 at 1, 5, and 10 min, and showed normal growth and development at 12 months. Conclusion: These cases are not directly comparable and cannot establish treatment efficacy or pregnancy outcome causality. They highlight the need for preconception counseling, individualized risk-benefit assessment, careful use of pregnancy-compatible maintenance therapy when clinically indicated, and multidisciplinary follow-up. Isolated weak MOG-IgA positivity requires cautious interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.