ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Artificial intelligence model based on the detection of key anatomical structures for identifying standard planes on ultrasound of the first-trimester fetal central nervous system: a multicenter study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prenatal ultrasound examination at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks' gestation can detect approximately 33-50% of major fetal structural abnormalities. Despite recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) for fetal ultrasound, its application in examining the first-trimester fetal central nervous system (FCNS) remains limited. This study aimed to develop, validate, and determine the clinical value of an AI FCNS model (FCNS-Model) based on the detection of key anatomical structures with the purpose of identifying FCNS ultrasound standard planes (FCNS-USPs). Methods: This study included 2,901 FCNS-USPs images from three hospitals, which were split into a training set (2,124 images), a test set (264 images), an internal validation set (254 images), and a clinical validation set (259 images). Additionally, an independent external validation set (300 images) was formed from images acquired at a fourth hospital. The performance of junior, intermediate, and senior physicians, as well as that of the FCNS-Model, was compared against the standard of an expert ultrasound team. Results: In the test set, the model achieved precision, recall, and F1 scores above 92%. For the internal validation set, classification accuracy for each plane was 99.3-100%, with kappa values >0.90, indicating strong agreement with the expert team. In the clinical validation set, FCNS-Model achieved significantly higher areas under the curve (AUCs) than did the senior physician for the anterior-posterior midsagittal plane (0.984 Conclusions: FCNS-Model accurately identifies FCNS-USPs and is an effective tool for assisting ultrasound physicians in obtaining standard planes and identifying key anatomical structures, particularly in settings with varying levels of operator experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.