ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
From pharmacological management to regenerative medicine: a bibliometric analysis of global trends and evolutionary patterns in diabetic bladder dysfunction (2000-2024).
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic bladder dysfunction (DBD) is a prevalent complication of diabetes that severely impacts quality of life. Conventional treatments have long been confined to managing downstream symptoms with minimal efficacy in advanced stages. This study employs systematic bibliometric analysis to comprehensively map the knowledge foundations, evolving research hotspots, and future translational trajectories in global DBD research spanning 2000 to 2024. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) for literature published between January 1, 2000, and August 8, 2024. To maximize the elimination of "noise" data typical of automated retrievals, a rigorous two-stage manual full-text screening process was employed, ultimately yielding 264 high-quality core original articles. Bibliometric tools, including CiteSpace and VOSviewer, were utilized to perform visual analyses of country/institution collaboration networks, citation bursts, and keyword timelines. Results: Over the past 25 years, the publication volume in the DBD field has exhibited a fluctuating upward trajectory. The global research landscape has evolved from the absolute dominance of U.S. in the early stages to a multipolar collaborative network that now includes China, Greece, and Germany. Keyword timeline clustering revealed a clear three-phase paradigm shift: the early phase (2000-2010) focused on physiological characterizations and symptomatic management (e.g., 'muscarinic receptors', 'smooth muscle'); the intermediate phase (2010-2018) delved into upstream core pathological mechanisms (e.g., 'oxidative stress', 'hypoxia', 'autonomic neuropathy'); and the recent phase (2019-2024) witnessed the sudden emergence of novel hot clusters such as 'defocused low-energy shock wave' and 'regeneration'. Conclusions: DBD research is undergoing a transition from pharmacological symptom control to regenerative repair targeting the underlying pathologies. Emerging physical-biomodulatory therapies, represented by low-energy shock waves, offer new hope for reversing the decompensation stage of bladder dysfunction. Future research urgently requires large-scale randomized controlled trials to advance the clinical translation of these regenerative medicine strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.