ArticleCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2026
Clinical translation of epigenome editing technologies.
Article in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas-based epigenome editing technologies hold great promise for identifying novel therapeutic targets, improving gene and cell therapies, and directly addressing the underlying issues in many diseases, all while minimizing risks of genotoxicity often associated with conventional genome editing. Exciting recent advances in CRISPR/Cas-based epigenome editing technologies have drastically enhanced the ability to precisely control the timing, levels, and durations of endogenous gene expression and reprogram epigenetic states in human cells. As a result, epigenome editing is now poised to unlock new biomedical discoveries and treatments for diseases driven by transcriptional and epigenetic dysregulation as well as those stemming from aberrantly repetitive genomic regions or complex genomic arrangements that are difficult to target using conventional genome editing. Additionally, the power of epigenome editors is generating new strategies to control cell fate and function, which has direct and important implications for cell therapies and regenerative medicines. Here, as the first wave of CRISPR/Cas-based epigenome editors move into clinical trials, we cover recent advances as the field looks to address pressing hurdles facing widespread clinical deployment of epigenome editing technologies including delivery, performance, and safety. For instance, the discovery of compact Cas chassis, engineering efforts to reduce effector sizes for efficient delivery, and campaigns to tailor the targeting discrimination of epigenome editors are rapidly progressing, as is research into the development of new effector domains with high specificity, robust performance, and a lack of immunogenicity and cytotoxicity. This exciting progress is quickly moving the community closer to fulfilling the promise of CRISPR/Cas-based epigenome editing as a powerful class of platform technologies for biological discoveries, biotechnological innovations, and medicines.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.