ReviewMicrobiome research reports2026
Early-life microbiome trajectories as biomarkers to predict health outcomes.
Review in Microbiome research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early-life gut microbiome is tightly linked to different aspects of infant development. Microbial colonisation patterns have been repeatedly shown to play a role in a variety of paediatric outcomes, ranging from metabolism and immune function to neurodevelopment. Concomitantly, the identification of early-life biomarkers is crucial, especially considering that for various conditions, reliable diagnostic tools only emerge in early childhood. As such, microbiome data collected in the first two years of life may offer valuable prospects for early detection, prevention, quantification or even correction of adverse health trajectories. With the increasing availability of high-resolution microbiome data, researchers are leveraging both traditional statistical approaches and machine learning (ML) methods to analyse the evolution of these complex microbial communities. While statistical models are well-suited for identifying associations between microbiome features and health states, ML methods allow for predicting health outcomes from those features. This review explores the role of the early-life gut microbiome in infant health and development, with a focus on how data acquisition and analytical methods can shape current knowledge. We contrast statistical approaches with ML methods, summarising key findings on microbial succession and factors influencing it. By addressing current challenges and identifying areas for methodological refinement, we aim to discuss the potential of the microbiome in the assessment of current and future health states of an individual and aid in the development of more robust, clinically-relevant models for paediatric care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.