ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Stroboscopic visual training and the brain: a narrative review of neural mechanisms underlying perceptual-cognitive adaptation in interceptive sports.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroboscopic visual training (SVT) is a perceptual-cognitive training paradigm that uses liquid-crystal eyewear to alternate between transparent and opaque states during sport-specific motor tasks, creating repeated cycles of vision and occlusion. By intermittently removing visual feedback, SVT compels the central nervous system to sustain internal predictions of moving targets rather than passively receiving real-time sensory input, placing concentrated and repeated demands on the predictive processing circuits that underpin performance in interceptive sports such as handball, volleyball, and soccer. Despite consistent behavioral evidence that SVT improves reaction speed, anticipatory skill, visuomotor performance, and sensorimotor balance control, the neural mechanisms driving these adaptations remain poorly characterized. This narrative review synthesizes evidence from SVT intervention studies, perceptual learning neuroscience, and sport neuroscience to propose a mechanistic account of how SVT may influence brain function. The review proposes that four neural systems may be engaged by SVT: the dorsal visual stream and MT/V5, which are repeatedly stressed by motion extrapolation demands during occlusion; the fronto-parietal attention network, which sustains predictive target representations across each occlusion cycle; the primary visual pathway, for which the only published SVT electrophysiology study demonstrated significantly reduced P100 latency following 6 weeks of stroboscopic training; and sensorimotor integration circuits, evidenced by SVT-induced changes in postural control and landing biomechanics. These findings are consistent with a proposed multi-level neuroplasticity model for SVT, though direct confirmation through concurrent EEG and fMRI designs remains an essential priority for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.