ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of a text messaging intervention to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening among Latinos: single-arm pilot study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Latinos, the largest minority group in the USA, have particularly low rates of lung cancer screening uptake. Although significant barriers exist, there is an overall strong interest in screening among Latinos when access is facilitated. Latinos have the highest rate of text messaging use in the USA and have expressed strong interest in participating in cancer prevention studies using text messages. No study has assessed the effectiveness of text messages to increase lung cancer screening uptake. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of Methods: This was a single-arm pilot study with 40 Latinos who were eligible for lung cancer screening but had not completed their annual screening. Participants were recruited using clinic- and community-based efforts. Results: At baseline, participants had a mean age of 59.1 years [standard deviation (SD) =6.5], 50% were women, 57.5% preferred Spanish, and 52.5% had a high school education or less. More than half of participants (65%) had never heard of lung cancer screening and 72.5% were unaware of their eligibility. Thirty-five participants (87.5%) completed the follow-up assessment at Month 3. The self-reported lung cancer screening rate was 20% (8/40). The electronic health record-verified lung cancer screening rate was 25% (10/40). Thirteen participants (32.5%; 13/40) completed the shared decision-making process. Thirty participants (90.9%, 30/33) reported being satisfied with the intervention and all participants (100%, 33/33) indicated they would recommend it to a friend or family member. Conclusions: It is feasible to recruit and retain Latinos in a lung cancer screening study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.