ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Quackery in Pakistan: a narrative literature review of a persistent public health threat.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and background: Quackery remains a significant yet under-recognized public health threat in Pakistan. The term "quack" varies in definition across regions but commonly refers to individuals lacking formal training, legal registration, and authorization to provide healthcare services. As per Section 2(XXIX) of the Sindh Health Care Commission (SHCC) Act, 2013, a quack is defined as a pretender delivering healthcare services without registration with the Pakistan Medical Commission (PMC), National Council for Tibb (NCT), National Council for Homeopathy (NCH), or Pakistan Nursing Council (PNC). Objectives: This narrative review aims to explore the historical background, current prevalence, and contributing factors sustaining the practice of quackery in Pakistan, as well as to propose potential strategies for its control and eradication. Materials and methods: A narrative literature search was conducted across various databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus, along with official government documents from the Pakistan Medical and Dental Commission (PMDC), Provincial Health Commissions of Pakistan, the World Health Organization (WHO), and news outlets. Findings: Quackery continues to flourish in both rural and urban areas, largely due to systemic challenges such as poverty, illiteracy, lack of access to qualified medical services, and public mistrust of formal healthcare systems. While some quacks may provide short-term symptom relief, the long-term consequences often result in severe health complications or fatalities. Conclusion: Addressing the widespread menace of quackery in Pakistan requires a multifaceted and coordinated strategy. This includes stricter policy enforcement, expanded health education programs, strengthened primary healthcare infrastructure, and strategic media engagement for public awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.