ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Second or subsequent microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstructive surgery: a narrative review.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Microvascular free tissue transfer is the cornerstone of complex head and neck reconstruction, with primary flap success rates exceeding 95% in high-volume centers. However, a growing number of patients require second or subsequent free flaps due to recurrent malignancy, osteoradionecrosis (ORN), primary flap failure, or functional and aesthetic refinements. These re-operative scenarios present a uniquely hostile surgical environment shaped by prior surgery, radiation, and vessel depletion, demanding a fundamentally different reconstructive strategy. Objectives: This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence on the indications, technical challenges, preoperative planning considerations, surgical strategies, and outcomes associated with second or subsequent microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Methods: A targeted literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library using key terms such as "second free flap," "salvage microsurgery," and "head and neck reconstruction." Emphasis was placed on clinical studies, case series, and expert reviews from the past three decades. Given the heterogeneity of the available data, a narrative - rather than systematic - approach was adopted to provide a clinically contextualized synthesis of the evidence. Key findings: Based predominantly on retrospective single-institution case series and systematic reviews of such data, reported flap survival rates for secondary reconstructions range from 90 to 95%, with further marginal declines for third or subsequent flaps. Common indications include locoregional cancer recurrence, ORN, and salvage after primary flap loss. The anterolateral thigh, scapular/parascapular, and fibula flaps are frequently employed due to their long pedicles and versatility. Critical technical considerations include advanced vascular mapping (typically via CT angiography), use of alternative recipient vessels (e.g., transverse cervical, internal mammary), and strategic deployment of vein grafts. Complication rates - particularly for pharyngocutaneous fistula, thrombosis, and wound dehiscence - are higher than in primary reconstruction, and outcomes are influenced by factors such as smoking status, nutritional health, and prior treatment burden. Conclusion: Second and subsequent free flaps are feasible and effective in experienced hands but require a paradigm shift in planning and execution. Success depends on meticulous multidisciplinary assessment, image-guided vascular mapping, technical adaptability, and a patient-centered approach that balances reconstructive ambition with realistic functional goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.