ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Knowledge, attitude, and awareness of artificial intelligence among medical staff in Kabul City.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being applied in medicine for diagnosis, treatment, and decision-making. While enthusiasm for AI training among healthcare workers has been reported globally, little is known about awareness and attitudes in Afghanistan, where limited access to advanced diagnostic tools makes AI particularly valuable. Objective: This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices of AI among healthcare workers in Kabul City. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from January to February 2025 among 256 healthcare staff, including physicians, nurses, technicians, and administrative personnel. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire distributed online and in paper format. Responses were recorded on a three-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, employing descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, regression, and correlation analyses. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Results: Of the participants, 71.1% were male (28.9% were female), and 43.8% were aged 21-29 years. Knowledge of AI was limited: only 1.6% demonstrated good knowledge, 44.7% poor knowledge, and 53.9% had insufficient knowledge. Attitudes were more favorable, with 47.3% expressing positive views, 37.5% somewhat agreeing, and 15.2% expressing negative views. Regression analysis revealed that age was significantly associated with knowledge scores, and knowledge strongly predicted positive attitudes. Reliability analysis confirmed acceptable internal consistency across domains (α ≥ 0.72). Conclusion: Knowledge of AI among medical staff in Kabul is limited, but attitudes are generally favorable. Structured training programs, conferences, and AI-enabled systems are needed to strengthen Afghanistan's healthcare sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.