ReviewFrontiers in genetics2026
Artificial intelligence in peptide cancer vaccine design: from neoantigen discovery to immunogenicity prediction.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peptide-based cancer vaccines represent a promising immunotherapeutic strategy aimed at inducing tumor-specific immune responses through the targeting of tumor-associated antigens and neoantigens. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing and immunogenomics have accelerated the identification of candidate neoantigens; however, the development of effective peptide vaccines remains limited by challenges related to antigen selection, HLA polymorphism, antigen processing, and variability in immunogenicity. Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning and deep learning approaches, has emerged as a transformative tool capable of addressing these limitations through large-scale integration and analysis of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and immunological data. In this review, we summarize the current role of AI across the peptide cancer vaccine development pipeline, from neoantigen discovery and epitope prioritization to prediction of peptide-HLA binding, antigen presentation, and T-cell receptor recognition. We discuss the application of modern computational frameworks, including pan-allelic prediction models, transformer-based architectures, immunopeptidomics-informed learning, and multi-modal AI systems integrating tumor and immune microenvironment data. Furthermore, we examine the clinical translation of personalized neoantigen vaccines, including their combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors and their emerging role in aggressive malignancies such as glioblastoma. Despite substantial progress, significant challenges remain, including high false-positive prediction rates, limited diversity of training datasets, biological complexity of immunogenicity, and regulatory and manufacturing barriers associated with individualized therapies. Continued integration of AI-driven prediction tools with experimental validation and translational immunology will be essential for the development of clinically effective and scalable precision cancer vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.