ReviewIndian journal of pharmacology2026
Combined use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for cardiovascular protection.
Review in Indian journal of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAmong the various treatments for type 2 diabetes during the initial period, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been considered together as agents with separate cardiometabolic benefits, given their limited glucose-lowering effects. GLP-1 RAs are reported to inhibit atherosclerosis through several physiological processes, including increased blood flow in endothelial tissues, decreased inflammation, increased antioxidant levels, and improved lipid profile. There is a similar situation with SGLT2 inhibitors, and the explanation for this is different yet complementary, as these drugs cause a decrease in both cardiac preload and afterload and, at the same time, increase vascular permeability, diuresis, and more efficient energy usage by the heart. Thus, they have been affirmed by extensive clinical trials, which show that, although these drugs may harm patients, they do not result in significant cardiovascular events, have a lower treatment rate for heart defects, and are associated with a longer time before the patient's renal function deteriorates. This translates into a continuing shift toward the dominion in terms of cardiometabolic protection - a strategy that is receiving strong backing from the majority of clinical guidelines across the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.