SynthesisClinical obesity2026
Burden and Risk of Depression in Patients Receiving Semaglutide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical obesity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), including semaglutide, are widely used for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity and related metabolic conditions. Evidence on potential neuropsychiatric effects remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated depression risk among patients receiving semaglutide. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, major biomedical databases, trial registries, pharmacovigilance databases, conference abstracts and grey literature were searched from inception to January 2026. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials, observational studies, large database analyses and pharmacovigilance disproportionality studies involving patients receiving semaglutide. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled risk ratio for depression was 1.25 (95% CI: 0.95-1.65; I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.