ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Multimodal Generative AI Framework for Predicting the Toxicity of Nanoparticles.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting the cytotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles remains a significant challenge due to the vast combinatorial diversity of their physicochemical properties. In this study, we developed a multimodal generative framework to synthesize high-fidelity nanoparticle candidates with predefined toxicity indices. We used a large language model to extract heterogeneous data from scientific articles and utilized SciBERT-based embeddings to encode unstructured textual toxicity summaries. Four generative architectures-CTGAN, TVAE, WGAN-GP, and TabDDPM-were benchmarked using the Synthetic Data Vault quality score. The TabDDPM demonstrated superior performance in capturing complex structure-activity relationships, achieving an SDV quality score of 0.78. The case study validation and feature evolution analysis prove the practical efficacy of the TabDDPM. To validate the physical plausibility of the best generated model, we conducted coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations in the GROMACS 2026.0 engine using the Martini 3.0.0 force field. Comparative analysis of safe and toxic nanoparticles candidates revealed that the toxic variant induced 2.4 times higher electrostatic stress (88.76 kJ/mol) and significantly prolonged membrane equilibration times. The safe candidates had a lower center-of-mass distance between the nanoparticle and the hydrophobic core of the lipid bilayer compared to the toxic counterpart. These results confirm that the proposed generative approach not only replicates statistical distributions but also captures the underlying biophysical mechanisms of membrane disruption, providing a potentially robust tool for the in silico design of biocompatible nanomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.