ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Livestock Multi-Omics Integration: A Systematic Framework From Statistical Association to Causal Interpretation.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Livestock multi-omics integration is key to unraveling complex trait regulation, yet systematic, livestock-specific strategies remain scarce. This review traces the progression from single-omics accumulation to multi-dimensional integration, highlighting how large-scale genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic projects lay the foundation for functional dissection. We identify core impediments: extreme species diversity, marked data heterogeneity, limited sample sizes, and a pervasive reduction of multi-omics data to simplistic differential screens, resulting in low translational efficiency. We critically appraise four common pitfalls-overinterpreting correlation as causation, relegating proteomics to corroborating transcriptomics, incomplete microbiome-host integration lacking environmental context, and systematic neglect of metabolic fluxomics-and show how exposomics and fluxomics add necessary causal and dynamic dimensions. To address these, we propose a livestock-adapted three-tier analytical framework: (1) statistical association of cross-omics covariation patterns; (2) machine learning-driven feature mining and integrative modeling; and (3) causal interpretation encompassing Mendelian randomization, prior-knowledge-guided network inference, and physical causal evidence via fluxomics and metabolic control analysis. We further discuss how multimodal sequencing (single-cell, spatial, temporal) and generative AI can fundamentally mitigate heterogeneity and strengthen causal evidence. Finally, we outline future priorities in database standardization, livestock-specific benchmarking, and translational pipelines, charting a path from correlation-centric reporting to mechanistic causality and precision breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.