ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Medication-related examination questions in clinical courses within undergraduate medical education.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePharmacotherapy is a core competence for physicians and students' learning is guided by examinations. This study aimed to examine medication-related examination questions across clinical courses spanning four semesters within a Swedish medical programme.
methodsIn total, 375 questions used in four examinations (spring 2025; University of Gothenburg) were categorised independently, followed by consensus discussions, into mutually exclusive groups. In the first step, it was determined whether a question was medication-related; if so, the second step involved categorising its content according to the WHO 6-Step Model, which structures the physician 's pharmacotherapeutic workflow from defining the patient's problem (differential diagnosis) and the therapeutic goal, to selecting and prescribing appropriate medications, counselling, and planning for monitoring and follow-up.
resultsNinety-four (25%) questions were related to medications, and an additional 44 (12%) included medications but they were not the primary focus. Half of the medication-related examination questions concerned general medication knowledge, including items where a condition was to be matched with the standard treatment (n = 47). The remaining questions (n = 47) addressed the first (n = 8), second (n = 5), third (n = 33), and fifth (n = 1) steps of the WHO 6-Step Model. No questions were related to the fourth and sixth steps.
conclusionPharmacotherapeutic aspects appeared as an integral component of written examinations in undergraduate clinical courses, but the questions often concerned drug selection and factual recall; other steps in the WHO Model deserve attention in other assessment procedures, including pharmacotherapy-related differential diagnosis, goal setting, technical aspects of prescribing, patient counselling, and follow-up monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.