Evidence mapPaperPMID 42584528Full record

SynthesisClinical drug investigation2026

Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab Biosimilars in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Mohsin Rashid, Awon Muhammad, Eeraj Saeed, Ali Akram Qureshi, Mohammad Maheer Mubashir, Mohammad Waqas Bin Waheed, Muhammad Abdullah Yasin, Muhammad Abdullah, Ahsan Rashid, Zainab Zubair

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical drug investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohsin RashidDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Awon MuhammadDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan. awon.muhammad096@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3020-9394
Eeraj SaeedDepartment of Medicine, District Headquarters Hospital, Jhelum, Pakistan.
Ali Akram QureshiDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mohammad Maheer MubashirDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mohammad Waqas Bin WaheedDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Abdullah YasinDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad AbdullahDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Ahsan RashidDepartment of Medicine, District Headquarters Hospital, Jhelum, Pakistan.
Zainab ZubairDepartment of Medicine, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPsoriasis is a chronic, debilitating disease affecting 1-3% of the global population. Ustekinumab has been established as an effective therapy for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, but its high cost limits patient access. Biosimilars offer a promising avenue to reduce costs and improve availability. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilars in comparison with ustekinumab.

methodsWe comprehensively searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and clinical trial registries from their inception through August 2025 for phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compared ustekinumab biosimilars with the reference product in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Data on efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were extracted. The primary outcome was the mean percent change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) from baseline at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included mean percent change in PASI from baseline at 28 and 52 weeks, mean change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score from baseline at 12 and 28 weeks, proportion of participants achieving a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score of 0 or 1 at 12 and 28 weeks, proportion of participants developing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), and proportion of participants experiencing treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) were calculated using the random-effects models.

resultsThe meta-analysis included nine RCTs reported across ten studies (nine publications and one trial registry record). Nine RCTs (n = 4,532 total; n = 2,169 experimental; n = 2,363 control) contributed data on the primary outcome. The pooled mean difference (MD) was 0.44 (95% CI - 0.99 to 1.88, p = 0.54), indicating no statistically significant difference in PASI at 12 weeks between biosimilars and ustekinumab. Across all efficacy and safety outcomes, biosimilars demonstrated no statistically significant differences from ustekinumab except for three outcomes: the mean percent change in PASI at 28 weeks, the mean change in DLQI score at 28 weeks, and the presence of ADAs. Although the differences in PASI and DLQI at 28 weeks reached statistical significance, they were not considered clinically meaningful. For ADA development, the pooled RR was 0.68 (95% CI 0.55-0.85; p = 0.0005). However, this finding was associated with substantial heterogeneity (I

conclusionUstekinumab biosimilars demonstrated no clinically meaningful differences across the outcomes and sustained comparable efficacy across all time points. These findings suggest that ustekinumab biosimilars offer a therapeutic profile comparable in safety and efficacy to that of the originator, providing evidence in favour of their adoption, which may result in wider patient access to biologics and reduced healthcare costs. PROSPERO: CRD420251133225.

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.