Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42584753›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Patterns of Lymph Node Metastases After Multimodality Therapy in Esophageal Carcinoma Treated with Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE).

Maxime E Sanders, Eline de Groot, Robin B den Boer, Jan Erik Freund, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Gert J Meijer, Stella Mook, Jelle P Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maxime E SandersDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. M.E.Sanders-6@umcutrecht.nl.
Eline de GrootDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Robin B den BoerDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan Erik FreundDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nadia Haj MohammadDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gert J MeijerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stella MookDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jelle P RuurdaDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Richard van HillegersbergDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymph node metastases (LNMs) in esophageal carcinoma demonstrate extensive and variable dissemination. Previous mapping studies are limited to region-based reporting, heterogeneous classification systems, and absence of contemporary multimodality-treated cohorts. This study aimed to characterize the station-level distribution of LNMs after standardized robot-assisted minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy (RAMIE) with two-field lymphadenectomy and to evaluate patterns in relation to key preoperative parameters.

methodsA prospective, single-center observational cohort of patients undergoing transthoracic RAMIE for adenocarcinoma (AC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) between 2018 and 2024 was analyzed. The primary outcome was station-level distribution of LNMs in relation to histology, tumor location, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy. Analyses were descriptive.

resultsAmong 210 patients (74% AC, 26% SCC), median lymph node yield was 44 (interquartile range [IQR], 34-52). Lymph node metastases were present in 42% of the patients, with a median of two positive nodes (IQR, 1-4). Although 91% received neoadjuvant therapy (85% CROSS, 7% FLOT), residual nodal disease remained frequent and widely distributed. Metastases occurred most frequently in the paraesophageal (11%) subcarinal (10%) mediastinal stations, and along the left gastric artery (22%) and right paracardial (15%) nodes. Thoracic duct LNM was identified in 9% of the patients. Patterns were similar across preoperative parameters. Occult nodal disease was observed in 32% of cN0 patients.

conclusionsLymphatic dissemination in esophageal cancer remains extensive and unpredictable, even after multimodality therapy. The persistence of cross-diaphragmatic nodal involvement across subgroups underscores the ongoing necessity of a systematic two-field lymphadenectomy to achieve optimal locoregional control and accurate pathologic staging.

Indexed as

2-field lymphadenectomyEsophageal cancerLymph node metastasesNeoadjuvant therapyTumor histologyTumor location

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.