Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42584784›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026

Reperfusion Injury and Infarct Size: Why Translation has Been Difficult, and How We Move Forward.

Heerajnarain Bulluck, Derek J Hausenloy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Heerajnarain BulluckDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Derek J HausenloyNational Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. derek.hausenloy@duke-nus.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo evaluate the reasons underlying the translational failure of cardioprotection in reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and propose a framework for designing future clinical cardioprotection trials. RECENT

findingsThe 2024 JACC Scientific Statement on reperfusion injury reframed the field as a network of interrelated injury pathways but stopped short of providing a clinically actionable framework. Contemporary cardioprotection trials in enriched patient STEMI cohorts have produced largely neutral results: STEMI-DTU, PiCSO-AMI-I, EURO-ICE, and COOL AMI EU failed to demonstrate cardioprotection on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) infarct size. Although the PITRI trial showed reduced periprocedural platelet reactivity with cangrelor there was no reduction in infarct size or microvascular obstruction (MVO), exemplifying proximal target engagement without affecting imaging surrogates. In contrast, the supersaturated oxygen (SSO₂) programme arc - AMIHOT → AMIHOT-II → IC-HOT → IC-HOT-MICRO - showed progressive patient enrichment yielding a progressive mechanistic signal, particularly in patients with severe coronary microvascular dysfunction. The Collaborative Registry on CMR in STEMI confirmed MVO ≥ 2.6% of left ventricular mass as an independent predictor of heart failure hospitalisation and all-cause death. The EU-CARDIOPROTECTION IMPACT criteria provide a preclinical standard for clinical translation. Translational failure of cardioprotection reflects misalignment between heterogeneous biology and trial design, not biological irrelevance. A biological ceiling cannot be excluded but is unlikely to be the dominant barrier. The path forward is to align patient selection, phenotype-specific endpoints, and adaptive trial architecture, and to test mechanical interventions together with pharmacological adjuncts rather than in isolation. When these elements are aligned - as the SSO₂ programme arc suggests - cardioprotection in STEMI may yet deliver clinically meaningful benefit.

Indexed as

Myocardial Reperfusion InjuryST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionHumansIschemic Preconditioning, MyocardialMyocardial ReperfusionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionTranslational Research, BiomedicalCardioprotectionCMRIntramyocardial haemorrhageMyocardial reperfusion injurySTEMITrial design

Identifiers

PMID42584784
PMCPMC13469488

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.