ArticlePloS one2026
Histochemical alteration, protein nitration, and antioxidant expression in oysters as early warning indicators for microplastic contamination in the Texas Gulf Coast.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastics are widely distributed in aquatic environments and have been detected in numerous organisms. Marine bivalves are among the most affected aquatic organisms by microplastics due to their filter-feeding behavior. In this study, 60 oysters were collected from two sites along the Texas Gulf Coast. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and Nile red staining were used to detect microplastics in oyster (Crassostrea virginica) tissues. We compared field and laboratory samples collected after a two-week depuration period to identify differences in the shape and size of microplastics in oyster tissues. Results from the field sites showed a large number of microplastics, mostly polyethylene (PE) fibers (~3-4 µm in size), in the gills and digestive glands. Conversely, laboratory samples showed a notable decrease in microplastic size (~1-2 µm), reinforcing the argument for cleaner waters. We performed immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis to assess the effects of PE fibers on the expression of 3-nitrotyrosine protein (NTP, a biomarker of protein nitration), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) in oyster tissues. IHC results revealed higher expression (P < 0.05) of NTP, SOD, and CAT in the tissues of field oysters compared to laboratory oysters, indicating that microplastics induce nitrative stress, which in turn elevates antioxidant enzyme activity in oyster tissues. Using Periodic-acid Schiff staining, we observed less mucus secretion in the tissues of field oysters than in those of laboratory oysters. This occurrence strengthens the argument that microplastics are causing heightened stress and leaving oysters vulnerable in the transport system and in immune function. Biochemical analysis showed significant (P < 0.05) differences in the pH of extrapallial (EF) fluid between field and laboratory oysters, but there were no differences in EF glucose levels. Overall, these findings suggest that PE microplastics cause histochemical and biochemical alterations, increased protein nitration, and increased antioxidant expression, which may impair physiological functions in oysters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.