ArticlePloS one2026
Correlates of muscle strengthening exercise in adolescents: A machine learning based analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMuscle-strengthening exercise (MSE) is a critical component of adolescent health, yet its correlates remain less understood than those of aerobic activity. This study aimed to identify key correlates of meeting MSE guidelines among U.S. adolescents using an explainable machine-learning approach.
methodsThis cross-sectional study used data from the 2023 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), a nationally representative sample of U.S. high school students (n = 20,103). An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier was developed to predict adherence to the MSE guideline (≥ 3 days/week) using sociodemographic, behavioural, dietary, and psychosocial predictors. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and partial dependence plots were employed to interpret feature importance and functional relationships.
resultsOverall, 61.8% of participants in the analytic sample met the MSE guideline. The XGBoost model demonstrated robust predictive performance (AUC = 0.835; Accuracy = 0.769). Feature importance analysis identified moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), sex, and fruit intake as the top predictors. SHAP summary plots revealed that higher MVPA, male sex, and healthier dietary behaviours were associated with a higher probability of meeting the guideline, while poorer mental health was linked to lower adherence.
conclusionMSE participation is not an isolated behaviour but is strongly clustered with aerobic activity and a broader healthy lifestyle profile. The findings highlight significant sex disparities and the role of psychosocial well-being in strengthening behaviours. Explainable machine learning provides a useful framework for identifying and prioritising correlates associated with MSE participation, which may help inform future hypothesis-driven research and potential public health strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.