Evidence mapPaperPMID 42585222Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Estimation of resting metabolic rate in professional soccer players: A cross-sectional study comparing traditional predictive equations and a preliminary machine learning model against indirect calorimetry.

Carlos Abraham Herrera-Amante, Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda, Eduardo Báez-San Martín, César Octavio Ramos-García, Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz, Rodrigo Olivares, José Francisco López-Gil

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlos Abraham Herrera-AmanteDivision of Health Sciences, Nutritional Assessment and Nutritional Care Laboratory, Tonalá University Center, University of Guadalajara, Tonalá, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3645-3621
Rodrigo Yáñez-SepúlvedaFaculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Viña del Mar, Chile.
Eduardo Báez-San MartínLaboratorio de Fisiología del Ejercicio y Rendimiento Deportivo, Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte, Universidad de Playa Ancha, Valparaíso, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3881-1015
César Octavio Ramos-GarcíaDivision of Health Sciences, Nutritional Assessment and Nutritional Care Laboratory, Tonalá University Center, University of Guadalajara, Tonalá, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3697-4013
Eduardo Guzmán-MuñozFacultad de Salud, Escuela de Kinesiología, Universidad Santo Tomás, Talca, Chile.
Rodrigo OlivaresEscuela de Ingeniería Informática, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
José Francisco López-GilSchool of Medicine, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7412-7624

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResting metabolic rate (RMR) is a major component of total daily energy expenditure and varies according to age, sex, and body composition. Although indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard, predictive equations are widely used in practice. This study evaluated the agreement between twelve traditional RMR equations and IC in professional soccer players and explored a preliminary machine learning approach.

methodsForty male professional soccer players (22.5 ± 4.4 years) were assessed. RMR measured by IC was compared with twelve predictive equations. A support vector regression (SVR) model was developed using anthropometric variables and evaluated under internal validation.

resultsAll equations showed poor concordance with IC (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: -0.094 to 0.030) and overestimated RMR (8.38% to 36.38%). The SVR model achieved a mean absolute error of 169.3 kcal·day-1 and root mean square error (RMSE) of 190.7 kcal·day-1. Its prediction error was lower than the RMSE and average bias of traditional equations, indicating improved individual-level accuracy. However, it explained a limited proportion of variance (R2 = 0.169).

conclusionTraditional equations showed poor agreement with indirect calorimetry in this sample of soccer players. These findings highlight the risks of relying on conventional predictive equations in professional athletes. Preliminary results suggest that machine learning models may improve estimation under internal validation, providing a proof of concept for data-driven approaches in this field. However, their predictive capacity remains limited, and external validation in larger and independent cohorts is required.

Indexed as

AthletesBasal MetabolismCalorimetry, IndirectMachine LearningSoccerAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEnergy MetabolismHumansMalePredictive Learning ModelsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42585222
PMCPMC13465844

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.