ArticlePloS one2026
Revisiting absent trails: Spatial memory of trail pheromones in termites.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Termites are social insects that coordinate cooperative behavior through pheromones. Trail pheromones play a central role in foraging and recruitment. Traditionally, termite navigation has often been modeled as a reflexive response to the current gradient of pheromone concentration, implying a stimulus-driven, taxon-type mechanism without necessarily requiring internal spatial representation. However, it remains unclear whether termites can form and utilize spatial information about the location of chemical cues. In this study, we investigated whether previous contact with a trail pheromone can bias termite movement after the pheromone-marked substrate has been removed. In the primary immediate test, entries into the exact target-side circle were not significantly higher in the pheromone condition, indicating that the effect was not a strong immediate return to a precise point. However, across the extended test phase, pheromone-exposed termites showed more entries and inward excursions toward the area where artificial trail pheromone had previously been presented, especially when broader target zones were considered. Together, these results suggest that termites can retain or use coarse spatial information about a previously encountered trail-pheromone cue, resulting in broad spatial bias rather than accurate point revisitation. Our findings extend the traditional view of trail pheromones as purely immediate stimuli by suggesting that pheromone experience can influence later movement after cue removal. This provides a cautious basis for considering how chemical cues may contribute to locale-like navigation in termites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.