ArticlePloS one2026
From structural insight to molecule: Integrative molecular simulations identify candidate pyruvate kinase activators.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pyruvate kinase (PKLR) is a key glycolytic enzyme that regulates red blood cell energy homeostasis. Although Mitapivat is the first approved allosteric activator for pyruvate kinase deficiency (PKD), its clinical utility is limited by metabolic and pharmacokinetic challenges, underscoring the need for improved analogues. This study aimed to identify novel Mitapivat-derived scaffolds with enhanced PKLR binding, stability, and drug-like properties using an integrated computational approach. A total of 190 structurally related derivatives were screened through molecular docking, pharmacophore modeling, frontier molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) analysis, 200 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, MM/PBSA free energy calculations, ADMET profiling, and retrosynthetic feasibility assessment. Comparative analyses were performed against Mitapivat and phenylalanine, an endogenous PKLR inhibitor. Among the screened compounds, CHEMBL3729403 and CHEMBL3729860 emerged as the most promising candidates. CHEMBL3729403 exhibited the strongest docking affinity (-9.10 kcal/mol) and superior MD stability, with the lowest average RMSD (0.419 nm) and highest hydrogen-bond occupancy (1.039). MM/PBSA calculations revealed stronger binding free energies for CHEMBL3729403 (-26.39 ± 3.21 kcal/mol) and CHEMBL3729860 (-23.05 ± 3.59 kcal/mol) than Mitapivat (-21.35 ± 3.46 kcal/mol) and phenylalanine (-3.89 ± 3.91 kcal/mol). Pharmacophore analysis demonstrated conservation of the key interaction features required for PKLR activation, while HOMO-LUMO analysis revealed comparable electronic characteristics across the lead compounds, supporting their compatibility with ligand-protein interactions. ADMET profiling predicted favorable oral absorption (81.5% and 81.3%), good intestinal permeability, acceptable drug-likeness, and the absence of predicted mutagenic, tumorigenic, reproductive, or irritant liabilities for CHEMBL3729403 and CHEMBL3729860. Retrosynthetic analysis further supported their synthetic accessibility through feasible sulfonamide-coupling routes. Overall, CHEMBL3729403 and CHEMBL3729860 were identified as promising putative PKLR activators with improved predicted binding, stability, and pharmacokinetic properties compared with Mitapivat. These findings warrant further experimental validation to confirm their therapeutic potential in PKD and related metabolic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.