Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42585606›Full record

ArticleNeurology2026

Association Between Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Alzheimer Disease Neuropathology.

Jennifer Bruno, Jacob S Shaw, S M Hadi Hosseini, for Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer BrunoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, CA; and.ORCID 0000-0001-7705-2456
Jacob S ShawDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-7906-9945
S M Hadi HosseiniDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, CA; and.
for Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
National Alzheimer's Coordinating CenterU24AG072122 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEPHENS, KARI A · 2021 to 2025
$45.8M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062422 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Katherine P Rankin · 2019 to 2026
$36.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062421 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BRADFORD C DICKERSON · 2019 to 2026
$36.5M
UCSD Shiley-Marcos Alzheimer's Disease Research Center P30P30AG062429 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DOUGLAS R GALASKO · 2019 to 2026
$34.9M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG062715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sanjay Asthana · 2019 to 2026
$34.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062677 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KEJAL KANTARCI · 2019 to 2026
$33.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066514 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Margaret Sewell · 2020 to 2026
$31.0M
Yale Alzheimer Disease Research CenterP30AG066508 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN M STRITTMATTER · 2020 to 2026
$30.2M
Research Education CoreP30AG066462 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PHILIP L DE JAGER · 2020 to 2026
$30.1M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066468 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI C. Elizabeth Shaaban · 2020 to 2026
$29.4M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066507 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Corinne Pettigrew · 2020 to 2026
$29.3M
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG083224NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068024NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068053NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068077NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068082NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062421NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062422NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062429NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062677NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062715NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066462NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066468NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066506NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066507NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066508NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066509NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066511NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066512NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066514NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066515NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066518NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066519NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066530NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066546NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072931NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072946NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072947NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072958NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072959NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072972NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072973NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072975NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072976NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072977NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072978NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072979NIA NIH HHS R01 AG072470NIA NIH HHS R01 AG073362NIA NIH HHS R01 AG079280NIA NIH HHS R21 AG064263NIA NIH HHS R21 AG073973NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U24 AG072122NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH123873NIMH NIH HHS R61 MH119289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesAlthough evidence suggests that the neurophysiologic impact of estrogen decline during menopause may contribute to increased risk of Alzheimer disease (AD) in women, the effect of menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) on AD risk requires further study. We sought to examine the associations between MHT use and neuropathologic, clinical, and imaging/fluid biomarker outcomes.

methodsIn this cohort study, we tested the association between estrogen-only MHT use and dementia outcomes in female participants using 2 independent, large-scale data sets: National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Participants included women 50 years and older with self-reported use of estrogen-only MHT or no self-reported use of MHT. Clinical, imaging/fluid biomarker, and neuropathologic outcomes were examined. Research was performed at academic medical centers.

resultsNeuropathologic data were collected from NACC for 258 MHT users (mean age of death = 81.9, SD = 19.5) and 2,701 non-MHT users (mean age of death = 82.2, SD = 11.0). The ADNI cohort included 110 MHT users (mean age = 76.5, SD = 7.5) and 1,948 non-MHT users (mean age = 73.2, SD = 8.9). The odds of increased AD pathology on autopsy (primary outcome) were significantly decreased in MHT users relative to nonusers (odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.88, DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate small but significant associations between MHT use during later life and a range of AD-related neuropathologic and clinical outcomes in 2 large cohorts of female participants. Although our results do not address causality and have limited generalizability due to the retrospective nature of the study, they suggest a protective effect of MHT use in the dementia course.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBrainEstrogen Replacement TherapyMenopauseAgedAged, 80 and overAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID42585606
PMCPMC13618972

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.