Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42586550›Full record

SynthesisApplied psychology. Health and well-being2026

Not all cues are equal: A systematic review and three-level meta-analysis of context consistency, physical activity and habit strength.

Lianghao Zhu, Yingying Tao, Bojun Zhou, Haoming Ma, Navin Kaushal, Xinyi Ma, Yi Guo, Rui Zhao, Solomon B Oguntuase, Hui Li and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lianghao ZhuKey Laboratory of Psychological and Physiological Regulation in Competitive Sports, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1026-9505
Yingying TaoKey Laboratory of Psychological and Physiological Regulation in Competitive Sports, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9063-3001
Bojun ZhouDepartment of Exercise Physiology, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0283-7280
Haoming MaSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0271-8409
Navin KaushalDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Health and Human Sciences, Indiana University- Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4511-7902
Xinyi MaKey Laboratory of Psychological and Physiological Regulation in Competitive Sports, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6894-386X
Yi GuoKey Laboratory of Psychological and Physiological Regulation in Competitive Sports, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4105-3734
Rui ZhaoKey Laboratory of Psychological and Physiological Regulation in Competitive Sports, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8703-1270
Solomon B OguntuaseSports Unit, Elizade University, Ilara-Mokin, Ondo State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7716-2479
Hui LiKey Laboratory of Psychological and Physiological Regulation in Competitive Sports, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3378-9573
Liancheng ZhangKey Laboratory of Psychological and Physiological Regulation in Competitive Sports, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5388-6501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although models on habit formation identify the importance of contextual cues as a prerequisite for physical activity (PA) habit formation, no quantitative synthesis has yet established which cue dimensions matter most for habit strength and PA behaviour. This study primarily examined the relationships of context consistency with PA behaviour and PA habit strength, compared effect sizes across five cue dimensions and explored potential moderators. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, including a search of six electronic databases. A three level random effects model was employed to account for effect size dependency. A total of 14 independent studies involving 6069 participants were integrated. Context consistency was significantly correlated with both PA behaviour (r = 0.11) and PA habit strength (r = 0.20). Although effect sizes were small, they are consistent with population-level benchmarks in the PA literature. Only temporal consistency and routine consistency were significantly correlated with PA behaviour; consistency of temporal, social, location, routine and mood cues showed significant positive associations with PA habit strength; no studies examined associations involving object cues. PA operationalisation (frequency vs. duration) moderated the consistency-behaviour relationship, with stronger effects when PA was operationalised as frequency rather than duration. Additionally, PA habit strength was found to be significantly positively correlated with PA behaviour, with a medium-to-large effect size. These findings indicate that cue dimensions differentially relate to PA outcomes, with temporal and routine cues emerging as key targets for behaviour-focused interventions, supporting a shift toward cue-specific PA promotion strategies.

Indexed as

CuesExerciseHabitsHumansautomatic processescueshealth‐related behaviourmeta‐analysisphysical activity promotion

Identifiers

PMID42586550
PMCPMC13467471

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.